Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to Comments

Fold/Spindle/Mutilate 2.1


An Online Dowser and Filter Of Important Information


Air Time

Richard Blow is the former executive editor of George Magazine. He is author of American Son: A Portrait of John F. Kennedy, Jr., and is writing a book about Harvard University.

Well, that didn’t take long. Air America, the liberal response to conservative talk radio, has only been broadcasting for a few hours and already conservatives are predicting its demise.

“It’ll never last,” said Michael Savage, the conservative who got booted off MSNBC after wishing AIDS on a hostile caller. Liberalism doesn’t have an audience, say Richard Viguerie and David Franke in a Los Angeles Times op-ed. Headliner Al Franken is too much of an insider to appeal to the outsiders who traditionally flock to talk radio, writes David Skinner in the Weekly Standard.

It’s enough to make you think that maybe conservatives are getting nervous. Sure, there are some hurdles for Air America. The people funding it, and most of its on-air hosts, don’t have much radio experience. It’s tough to break into the radio market these days

Air America Is On The Air


This Isn’t America

By PAUL KRUGMAN

Last week an opinion piece in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz about the killing of Sheik Ahmed Yassin said, “This isn’t America; the government did not invent intelligence material nor exaggerate the description of the threat to justify their attack.”

So even in Israel, George Bush’s America has become a byword for deception and abuse of power. And the administration’s reaction to Richard Clarke’s “Against All Enemies” provides more evidence of something rotten in the state of our government.

The truth is that among experts, what Mr. Clarke says about Mr. Bush’s terrorism policy isn’t controversial. The facts that terrorism was placed on the back burner before 9/11 and that Mr. Bush blamed Iraq despite the lack of evidence are confirmed by many sources — including “Bush at War,” by Bob Woodward.

And new evidence keeps emerging for Mr. Clarke’s main charge, that the Iraq obsession undermined the pursuit of Al Qaeda. From yesterday’s USA Today: “In 2002, troops from the Fifth Special Forces Group who specialize in the Middle East were pulled out of the hunt for Osama bin Laden to prepare for their next assignment: Iraq. Their replacements were troops with expertise in Spanish cultures.”

That’s why the administration responded to Mr. Clarke the way it responds to anyone who reveals inconvenient facts: with a campaign of character assassination.

(Read the article)

Found at Starbucks: The Pentagon’s Papers

March 31, 2004

Download: PDF

As most of America slept early last Sunday morning, the Bush Administration hustled and bustled to prepare for the Sunday morning talk shows – among others Colin Powell was appearing on Face the Nation and Donald Rumsfeld was booked on Fox News Sunday. Condi Rice was not scheduled to appear until prime time, when she would make a star appearance on CBS’ ‘60 Minutes’ – the last in a long line of media appearances that caused 9/11 Commissioner Richard Ben Veniste to quip that “Condi Rice has appeared everywhere but at my local Starbucks.”

Well, others in the Bush administration did, apparently, make an appearance at the local Starbucks. And as the Washington Post reports today, one of them – obviously readying himself to prep Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld – left his notes on the table. Talking points, hand-written notes on spin tactics, and a hand-drawn map to the Secretary’s house were found by a resident of DuPont Circle, who made them available to the Center for American Progress. The name of said resident is being withheld at his request, as he fears that he may be accused on national television of being “disgruntled.”

Note to Eric: U Need 2B More Careful

By Al Kamen

Did you hear the one about the guy at Starbucks? No? Okay. A guy walks into the Starbucks at Connecticut Avenue and R Street NW on Sunday to get his favorite latte, and sits down at a table.

On the table, he spots four pieces of paper. One is stationery with the heading “Office of the Secretary of Defense,” and right under that “The Special Assistant.”

It has a penciled map of directions from the Pentagon to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld’s house in Northwest Washington. Another sheet says, “Eric’s Telephone Log.” Someone has written “Conf. call” at the top and some notes, some in partial shorthand, on one side. These apparently were taken by Eric. To view the actual documents Go HERE.To continue the WP story, click below.

(Read the article)

A live stream will also be on the Air America Web site. Their lineup includes Al Franken, Chuck D and Janeane Garofalo.

A live stream will also be on the Air America Web site. Their lineup includes Al Franken, Chuck D and Janeane Garofalo.

A live stream will also be on the Air America Web site. Their lineup includes Al Franken, Chuck D and Janeane Garofalo.

A live stream will also be on the Air America Web site. Their lineup includes Al Franken, Chuck D and Janeane Garofalo.

A live stream will also be on the Air America Web site. Their lineup includes Al Franken, Chuck D and Janeane Garofalo.

A live stream will also be on the Air America Web site. Their lineup includes Al Franken, Chuck D and Janeane Garofalo.

Pearl’s Widow Denied 9/11 Funds

The widow of slain Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl is seeking compensation from the Sept. 11 victims’ fund, saying her husband, like the victims of the attacks, was a U.S. citizen targeted by Islamic extremists.

Mariane Pearl has filed a formal appeal with the fund after initially being denied, The New York Times reported for a story in Tuesday editions.

“What’s horribly, painfully obvious is that if Danny Pearl had come from any other country in the world, he’d be alive today,” Mariane Pearl’s lawyer, Robert Kelner, told the Times. “And because there is a 9-11 fund which is compensating people for the exact same kind of death, we feel that Danny should be included as a victim in the same class as other victims.”
(Read the article)

Why is the Richard Clarke imbroglio heading into its second week with a full head of steam?

By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer

Why is the Richard Clarke imbroglio heading into its second week with a full head of steam?

Washington has seen these controversies before, where some self-styled whistleblower is thrust into the spotlight, and they usually burn themselves out after a few days. But the White House-versus-Clarke warfare is being waged with a level of intensity that even the battle-scarred capital has rarely seen.

Clarke has touched some kind of deep nerve, which is why every columnist, commentator and talk show host has felt compelled to weigh in on one side or the other. And why the White House caved this morning and said Condi Rice could testify, after many days of insisting that a terrible principle would be violated if she did.

Here are some reasons why this story just won’t quit:
(Read the article)

Keeping track of Bush’s fibs and distortions

By Molly Ivins,
Creators Syndicate. Molly Ivins is a syndicated columnist based in Austin, Texas

Naturally, when I heard President Bush is now claiming to be in the forefront of the fight against corporate crime, I thought it was an April Fools’ joke. But no, there it is in print–he made a big speech about it in Houston, of all places, not far from the Enron Corp. building.

“We had to confront corporate crimes that cost people their jobs and their savings,” he said. “So we passed strong corporate reforms and made it very clear, we will not tolerate dishonesty in the boardrooms of America.”

We did; we won’t? Oh, he was talking about the Sarbanes-Oxley bill, that set of inadequate corporate reform measures that he opposed until it passed the House of Representatives with just a handful of dissenting votes and he couldn’t face the political heat any longer. That bill.

I notice a favorite quibble from the White House here–its new explanation is that Bush didn’t oppose the bill per se, he just opposed “many of its main provisions.” That would be exactly the same way he opposed “many of the main provisions” in the Patients Bill of Rights Act when he was governor of Texas: He hated it so bad he never did sign it and then later claimed, “We passed the Patients Bill of Rights in Texas.” I think he has a pronoun problem.

The people who spend their time keeping track of George W. Bush’s fibs, exaggerations, distortions, misleading remarks and flat-out lies are working at a frenzied pace these days. I particularly enjoyed the Bushies’ sober new analysis that John Kerry’s fiscal plan would leave us $1 trillion in the hole. This is the same set of drunken sailors that wants to leave us $5 trillion in the hole over 10 years by making the Bush tax cuts permanent.

Great, let’s save $4 trillion and vote for Kerry.

(Read the article)

Bush’s brand new enemy is the truth

Clarke’s claims have shaken the White House to its foundations

Sidney Blumenthal
The Guardian

One of the first official acts of the current Bush administration was to downgrade the office of national coordinator for counterterrorism on the National Security Council – a position held by Richard Clarke. Clarke had served in the Pentagon and State Department under presidents Reagan and Bush the elder, and was the first person to hold the counterterrorism job created by President Clinton. Under Clinton, he was elevated to cabinet rank, which gave him a seat at the principals’ meeting, the highest decision-making group for national security.

By removing Clarke from the table, Bush put him in a box where he could speak only when spoken to. No longer would his memos go to the president; instead, they had to pass though a chain of command of national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and her deputy, Stephen Hadley, who bounced each of them back.

Terrorism was a Clinton issue: “soft” and obscure, having something to do with “globalisation”, and other trends ridiculed from the Republican party platform. “In January 2001 the new administration really thought Clinton’s recommendation that eliminating al-Qaida be one of their highest priorities, well, rather odd, like so many of the Clinton administration’s actions, from their perspective,” Clarke writes in his new book, Against All Enemies. When Clarke first met Rice and immediately raised the question of dealing with al-Qaida, she “gave me the impression she had never heard the term before”.

The controversy raging around Clarke’s book and his testimony before the 9/11 commission that Bush ignored warnings about terrorism that might have prevented the attacks revolves around his singularly unimpeachable credibility. In response, Bush has launched an offensive against him, impugning his personal motives, saying he is a disappointed job-hunter, publicity-mad, a political partisan, ignorant, irrelevant – and a liar.

Clarke’s reputation in the Clinton White House was that he could be brusque and passionate, but also calm and single-minded. He was a complete professional, who was a master of the bureaucracy. He didn’t suffer fools gladly, stood up to superiors and didn’t care who he alienated. His flaw was his indispensable virtue: he was direct and candid in telling the unvarnished truth.

(Read the article)

I

by Arianna Huffington

To the list of Campaign 2004

I

by Arianna Huffington

To the list of Campaign 2004

I

by Arianna Huffington

To the list of Campaign 2004

I

by Arianna Huffington

To the list of Campaign 2004

I

by Arianna Huffington

To the list of Campaign 2004

Next Page »