Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to Comments

Fold/Spindle/Mutilate 2.1


An Online Dowser and Filter Of Important Information


How to Get Out of Iraq

By Peter W. Galbraith

1.

In the year since the United States Marines pulled down Saddam Hussein’s statue in Baghdad’s Firdos Square, things have gone very badly for the United States in Iraq and for its ambition of creating a model democracy that might transform the Middle East. As of today the United States military appears committed to an open-ended stay in a country where, with the exception of the Kurdish north, patience with the foreign occupation is running out, and violent opposition is spreading. Civil war and the breakup of Iraq are more likely outcomes than a successful transition to a pluralistic Western-style democracy.

Much of what went wrong was avoidable. Focused on winning the political battle to start a war, the Bush administration failed to anticipate the postwar chaos in Iraq. Administration strategy seems to have been based on a hope that Iraq’s bureaucrats and police would simply transfer their loyalty to the new authorities, and the country’s administration would continue to function. All experience in Iraq suggested that the collapse of civil authority was the most likely outcome, but there was no credible planning for this contingency. In fact, the US effort to remake Iraq never recovered from its confused start when it failed to prevent the looting of Baghdad in the early days of the occupation.


Americans like to think that every problem has a solution, but that may no longer be true in Iraq. Before dealing at considerable length with what has gone wrong, I should also say what has gone right.

Iraq is free from Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party. Along with Cambodia’s Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein’s regime was one of the two most cruel and inhumane regimes in the second half of the twentieth century. Using the definition of genocide specified in the 1948 Genocide Convention, Iraq’s Baath regime can be charged with planning and executing two genocides —one against the Kurdish population in the late 1980s and another against the Marsh Arabs in the 1990s. In the 1980s, the Iraqi armed forces and security services systematically destroyed more than four thousand Kurdish villages and several small cities, attacked over two hundred Kurdish villages and towns with chemical weapons in 1987 and 1988, and organized the deportation and execution of up to 182,000 Kurdish civilians.

In the 1990s the Saddam Hussein regime drained the marshes of southern Iraq, displacing 500,000 people, half of whom fled to Iran, and killing some 40,000. In addition to destroying the five-thousand-year-old Marsh Arab civilization, draining the marshes did vast ecological damage to one of the most important wetlands systems on the planet. Genocide is only part of Saddam Hussein’s murderous legacy. Tens of thousands perished in purges from 1979 on, and as many as 300,000 Shiites were killed in the six months following the collapse of the March 1991 Shiite uprising. One mass grave near Hilla may contain as many as 30,000 bodies.

In a more lawful world, the United Nations, or a coalition of willing states, would have removed this regime from power long before 2003. However, at precisely the time that some of the most horrendous crimes were being committed, in the late 1980s, the Reagan and Bush administrations strongly opposed any action to punish Iraq for its genocidal campaign against the Kurds or to deter Iraq from using chemical weapons against the Kurdish civilians.

On August 20, 1988, the Iran–Iraq War ended. Five days later, the Iraqi military initiated a series of chemical weapons attacks on at least forty-nine Kurdish villages in the Dihok Governorate (or province) near the Syrian and Turkish borders. As a staff member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I (along with Chris Van Hollen, now a Maryland congressman) interviewed hundreds of survivors in the high mountains on the Turkish border. Our report, which established conclusively that Iraq had used nerve and mustard agents on tens of thousands of civilians, coincided with the Senate’s passage of the Prevention of Genocide Act of 1988, which imposed comprehensive economic sanctions on Iraq for crimes against the Kurds. The Reagan administration opposed the legislation, in a position orchestrated by the then national security adviser, Colin Powell, calling such sanctions “premature.”

(Read the article)

Ben & Jerry’s Uses Sound to Chill Ice Cream

audio iconAll Things Considered audio

Thermoacoustic prototype that uses a
Thermoacoustic prototype that uses a “Bellows Bounce” resonator.

— Scientists have found a new way to refrigerate ice cream, by using sound waves instead of chemicals. The system, which can power a small ice-cream freezer case, is sponsored by Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream, a company known for its efforts to protect the environment.

At the heart of the system is sound — a 190-decibel note that fluctuates some 100 times per second. That expansion and compression creates pockets of cold and warm air. A system of air circulators then funnels the cool air into the ice cream case.

The new “green” freezer isn’t likely to be seen in stores any time soon, because of its cost — considerably more than conventional freezers that use chemicals. But its creators say their system works, and it uses cheap components to do work currently done by exotic — and often dangerous — chemicals.

While the commercial future of the system is uncertain, it passed a recent test at a Ben & Jerry’s store in New York. NPR’s Robert Smith reports.

Web Resources

Thermoacoustics at Ben & Jerry’s Site

Article on ‘Green’ Chiller at Penn State Site


DEFENDING THE SAUDIS AT ALL COSTS

Bush and Cheney have never addressed why relatives of Osama bin Laden were allowed to be flown within United States immediately after 9/11 to facilitate their quick return to Saudi Arabia, even though American airspace was closed to flights. Who gave the order to allow these flights? Also, why did the president classify portions of a bipartisan congressional report documenting potential ties that his friends in the Saudi government may have had to the 9/11 hijackers? And more generally, did the President’s and top administration officials’ close personal/financial relationships with the Saudis compromise America’s national security before 9/11 and after?


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!


A Village in Texas is Missing It’s Idiot!

UNDERCUTTING PROTECTION OF WILD SALMON

In a cynical move designed to undercut the nation’s environmental laws “the Bush administration has decided to count hatchery-bred fish, which are pumped into West Coast rivers by the hundreds of millions yearly, when it decides whether stream-bred wild salmon are entitled to protection under the Endangered Species Act.” The decision reverses 15 years of environmental policy to protect stream-bred wild salmon at the request of “farm, timber and power interests” who have complained about the costs associated with protecting salmon’s natural habitat. But according to the world’s top scientific experts on the issue “fish produced in hatcheries cannot be counted on to save wild salmon.” The scientists were told that “their conclusions about hatchery fish were inappropriate for official government reports.”

New Searchable Database Charts Bush/Cheney Lies

As the September 11th Commission grills President Bush and Vice President Cheney about their contradictory statements today, we wanted to alert you to a powerful new tool to help journalists, activists and the public compare the Bush administration’s claims against well-documented facts. The Center for American Progress today launched a comprehensive Claim vs. Fact database at www.claimvfact.org that documents statements from conservatives like President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Members of Congress and Fox News personalities, and compares those statements to the facts. Each fact is sourced, and in many cases includes a web link directly to that source.

The database has more than 400 entries so far, but THEY NEED YOUR HELP BUILDING IT. If you know of a lie, distortion or dishonest statement from a Bush Administration official or another conservative that isn’t already in the database, please go to their submission page at:

http://tinyurl.com/3e8xc

or

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/apps/fc/form.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=50898

There you can submit an entry for addition to the database, so that the tool grows and becomes a real-time tracker of lies.

BP backs out of Iraq

Blow to rebuilding hopes as BP backs out

Chief oil industry executive cites security and political fears
Terry MacalisterThe Guardian

BP’s chief executive delivered a serious setback to hopes of rebuilding Iraq when he said that the oil company has no future there.

John Browne, one of Tony Blair’s favourite industrialists, indicated he had given up on Iraq because the political and security situation in the country had deteriorated so much.

Yet only 18 months ago he was extremely enthusiastic about prospects, lobbying in Washington and London to ensure American rivals did not cut him out of the action.

“We need a government, we need laws and we need decisions. We have not got any of that yet. A whole range of steps need to be taken,” said the BP boss as he unveiled new record profits this week.

“It’s not obvious to me you need foreign oil companies to do that [redevelopment].” He added that private oil firms could destabilise an already sensitive situation and perhaps it should be left to local state-owned groups.

The pessimistic view about the future in Iraq was expressed hours after Lord Browne had met the prime minister at the launch of a new climate change organisation.

(Read the article)

Fervent falsehoods

The Bush-Cheney campaign is spending an unprecedented amount of money to hold on to supporters whose faith might be tested by the facts.

By Sidney Blumenthal

Perhaps the most important divide in the presidential campaign is between fact and fiction. There are, of course, other sharp distinctions based on region and religiosity, guns and gays, abstinence and abortion. But were the election to be decided on domestic concerns alone George W. Bush would be nearly certain to join the ranks of one-term presidents, like his father after the aura of the Gulf War evaporated.

But one year after Bush’s triumphant May Day landing in a flight suit on the deck of the USS Lincoln and appearance behind the White House-ordered sign “Mission Accomplished,” his splendid little war has entered a Stalingrad-like phase of urban siege and house-to-house combat. By far, April has been the bloodiest month — 122 U.S. soldiers killed, compared with 73 last April in the supposed last month of the war. The unending war has inspired among Bush’s backers a rally-’round-the-flag effect, a redoubling of belief.

They believe in the cause as articulated by Vice President Dick Cheney this past week in his speech at Westminster College in Fulton, Mo., where Winston Churchill delivered his famous “Iron Curtain” oration. “You and I are living in such a time” of the “gravest of threats,” said Cheney. Churchill stands as the model of leadership. “And today we have such a leader in President George W. Bush.” Once again Cheney explains the motive for the Iraq war, implicitly conflating Saddam Hussein with al-Qaida and oblivious to the failure to discover WMD. “His regime cultivated ties to terror,” he said, “and had built, possessed, and used weapons of mass destruction.” And Saddam “would still be in power,” he continued, coming to the point of his allegory, if John Kerry, cast as Neville Chamberlain, had had his way.

(Read the article)

Bush Diverting Enviro Funds Into Fossil Fuels

President Bush yesterday tried to deflect questions about his environmental record by claiming that he supports efforts to reduce America’s fossil fuel usage1. He said he had “introduced ideas like a hydrogen-powered automobile, put money behind it and research behind it” so that so that we will be “less dependent on foreign sources of energy” and we will “improve the environment.” But Bush’s hydrogen-automobile proposal is purposely engineered to be fossil fuel dependent, and it is paid for by taking money out of programs that are actually reducing fossil fuel use.

As Mother Jones reported, “the Bush Administration has been working quietly to ensure that the system used to produce hydrogen will be as fossil fuel-dependent - and potentially as dirty - as the one that fuels today’s SUVs. According to the administration’s National Hydrogen Energy Roadmap, drafted last year in concert with the energy industry, up to 90% of all hydrogen will be refined from oil, natural gas, and other fossil fuels”2. Such a system, experts say, would effectively eliminate most of the benefits offered by hydrogen because the Bush plan’s use of oil/coal/gas to create fuel cells would generate large amounts of pollution. Not surprisingly, such a system would insure the massive profits of the energy industry, which bankrolls Bush’s campaign3.

Bush is, in part, paying for this fossil-fuel-based program by stripping funding from programs that are actually reducing fossil fuel use in America. As AP reported, Bush moved money into his hydrogen program at the same time he “ended an eight-year program to help automakers develop high-mileage, family size cars” such as the successful hybrids now beginning to permeate the U.S. market4. Additionally, Bush proposed reducing “federal funding for renewable energy and efficiency research program by more than $200 million in 2002″5.

(Read the article)

A Vision of Power

By PAUL KRUGMAN

There’s a deep mystery surrounding Dick Cheney’s energy task force, but it’s not about what happened back in 2001. Clearly, energy industry executives dictated the content of a report that served their interests.

The real mystery is why the Bush administration has engaged in a three-year fight

Whose Hospital Is It?

MCP Hospital didn’t have any celebrity doctors or slick ad campaigns. All it had was a 150-year history serving its Philadelphia neighborhood–and in today’s cutthroat health care industry, that’s no longer enough.

By Arthur Allen

Gregory Gay was born 21 years ago at the Medical College of Pennsylvania Hospital (MCP), a venerable community hospital in Philadelphia’s East Falls neighborhood. He was shot six blocks away on January 24, not long after Tenet Healthcare Corp. decided to close the hospital. Tenet, the second-largest for-profit hospital chain in the United States, was in the process of shuttering or selling a quarter of its more than 100 hospitals nationwide. As it waited for a judge’s permission to shut down MCP, the company was slowly withdrawing services, closing floors, and letting the staff fade away through attrition.

When police and paramedics arrived moments after four bullets pierced Gay’s body that icy Friday night, he was fighting for his life and lucid enough to give the names of two men who had shot him. But instead of zipping up Henry Avenue to MCP, the ambulance raced to Temple University Hospital, some 20 minutes away. MCP’s struggling emergency room was on “diversion”— temporarily closed to new patients—that night, as it had been for much of that month. Gay died less than an hour later.

Gay’s death, one of many in the violent North Philadelphia streets whose sick and wounded feed the hospital, has become part of a lawsuit seeking to keep MCP open while charging that Tenet neglected its obligations to the city. (Tenet management refused to comment for this story.) Of course, it is uncertain whether Gay would have survived even had the hospital been fully operational. But the closing of MCP, a community hospital in every sense of the word, would clearly mean more hardship for thousands of its neighbors. Symbolically, in the minds of the hospital’s defenders, Gay’s death has come to stand for the deaths to come—not only the gunshot wounds, but the asthma attacks, the strokes and embolisms and diabetic comas that are likely to be aggravated by new delays and complications.

Not that MCP’s fate is unusual. Tenet has closed three hospitals during its five years in Philadelphia; over the past decade, four other North Philadelphia hospitals have shut down their inpatient units. Nationwide, according to data compiled by the federal government and Modern Healthcare magazine, more than 560 hospitals have closed since 1990—clobbered by stagnant reimbursement rates from government and the insurance industry, rising malpractice rates, skyrocketing prices for drugs and medical equipment, and increasing numbers of uninsured patients who can’t pay their bills.

(Read the article)

Next Page »