Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to Comments

Fold/Spindle/Mutilate 2.1


An Online Dowser and Filter Of Important Information


Where democracy refuses to die

News

Supporters of Ukrainian opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko hold a mass rally in the main square of Kiev, Monday, Nov. 29, 2004.

The media was pro-government. In much of the country, the election machinery was controlled by the ruling party. Voter fraud was rampant. But the people of Ukraine will not surrender.

By David Talbot

Progressive American voters, still downcast over the results of the presidential election — as well as an election system gravely impaired by the antiquated Electoral College, fraud-inviting electronic machines, and rampant political abuses — can take vicarious pleasure these days from Ukrainian democracy. Throughout the presidential campaign in the former Soviet republic, opposition candidate Viktor Yushchenko struggled against a government-controlled media and election machinery that heavily favored his opponent, Viktor Yanukovych, the handpicked successor to the country’s corrupt and thuggish president, Leonid Kuchma. But when Yushchenko was denied victory in the Nov. 21 election, after widespread fraud, the opposition leader and his supporters did not fade away — they took to the streets and refused to accept the official version of the election.

With the Ukrainian Supreme Court still deliberating the opposition’s election challenge — and the democratic revolution in full flower on the wintry streets of Kiev — Salon spoke with Olena Prytula, editor in chief of Ukrayinska Pravda (Ukrainian Truth), the courageous Web site that has been responsible for some of the country’s only aggressive, independent coverage of the Kuchma regime. Prytula’s partner, Georgi Gongadze, was kidnapped, murdered and beheaded four years ago — an execution that a former bodyguard of Kuchma later charged was personally ordered by the president. In the past few weeks, Prytula and her small staff have thrown themselves into covering the dramatic election and aftermath, with traffic to her site ballooning to five times the normal flow. Prytula spoke by phone from Kiev, after another long, exhausting day, about the democratic uprising that contains “some small part of my work and my soul.”

(Read the article)

Validate the Vote

Also see below: 
Activists Keep Heat on Ohio Over Ballot Errors  �

By Ian H. Solomon   The Baltimore Sun

Most mainstream newspapers have already dismissed stories of voting fraud and voting rights violations in the November election as baseless or irrelevant. Sen. John Kerry’s concession is supposed to demonstrate that there is no story here. Give up, go home, it’s all over.

But it’s not over.

The legitimacy of our democratic process is an issue more important than Mr. Kerry’s future or the results of 2004. That legitimacy has been called into question repeatedly over the past few weeks, and doubts will linger as long as credible indications of error, negligence, disenfranchisement and fraud are not addressed.

We would like to believe that voting irregularities were identified and corrected, that participants fulfilled their duties appropriately, that the machines performed reliably and that the total discrepancy between voter intention and recorded results was less than the margin of victory in relevant contests.

But that conclusion must be reached on the basis of evidence, not blind faith. My own observations as a volunteer poll watcher in Florida do not give perfect confidence.

As many experts had warned, the electronic voting machines used across the country were vulnerable to glitches and possible tampering, including the over-recording of votes and the “disappearance” of valid votes.

We experienced a troubling number of memory card failures where I was based in Volusia County, for example, and we tried to minimize the disruption to voters even though data security was compromised. In Franklin County, Ohio, a machine error resulted in an extra 4,000 votes for President Bush. In Guilford County, N.C., a machine error cost Mr. Kerry 22,000 votes. Similar problems were experienced in Nebraska, Indiana and other states. These glitches that we know about have reportedly been fixed, though a re-vote is necessary in a different North Carolina county.

Disturbingly, several Web sites have demonstrated the ease of hacking into the AccuVote TS machines made by Diebold Election Systems, the company that for $2.6 million recently settled a lawsuit by California over voting machine problems. Another major manufacturer of electronic voting machines, Election Systems & Software, has also been subject to criticism for machine breakdowns and vulnerability. There is no evidence of fraud, but neither manufacturer has assuaged widespread concerns about inappropriate partisanship and unreliability.


(Read the article)

Rumsfeld Sued for Alleged War Crimes

Germany | 30.11.2004

Rumsfeld Sued for Alleged War Crimes

Rumsfeld has not felt a need to take the blame for Abu Ghraib

Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift: Rumsfeld has not felt a need to take the blame for Abu Ghraib

Alleging responsibility for war crimes and torture at Baghdad’s Abu Ghraib prison, a human rights group has filed a criminal complaint in Germany against US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other top US officials.

The New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and Berlin’s Republican Lawyers’ Association said they and five Iraqi citizens mistreated by US soldiers were seeking a probe by German federal prosecutors of leading US policymakers.

They said they had chosen Germany because of its Code of Crimes Against International Law, introduced in 2002, which grants German courts universal jurisdiction in cases involving war crimes or crimes against humanity.

It also makes military or civilian commanders who fail to prevent their subordinates from committing such acts liable.

“No other place to go”

“We filed these cases here because there is simply no other place to go,” CCR vice president Peter Weiss said in a statement, adding that the US Congress had “failed” to seriously investigate the abuses. “It is clear that the US government is not willing to open an investigation into these allegations against these officials.”

(Read the article)

Setting the Conditions for War Crimes

By Marjorie Cohn    t r u t h o u t | Perspective


I was drafted in 1967 and I served in Vietnam for 1 year … So this area was mostly all free-fire zones. So it was with this understanding that it was a free-fire zone that everything was fair game. If at any time you saw people in any way trying to avoid you or run away or make suspicious movements, that was free game. You could go ahead and shoot them and kill them. – Testimony of Guadalupe G. Villarreal, Dellums (House of Representatives) War Crimes Hearings, Apr. 28, 1971, Washington D.C.

Thirty-six years later, NBC war correspondent Kevin Sites, embedded with the U.S. Marines in Fallujah, wrote in his November 10 blog: “The Marines are operating with liberal rules of engagement.” Sites heard Staff Sgt. Sam Mortimer radio that “everything to the west is weapons free.” Weapons Free, explained Sites, “means the Marines can shoot whatever they see – it’s all considered hostile.” On November 13, Sites videotaped a U.S. Marine killing an unarmed, wounded Iraqi in a Fallujah mosque.

During the U.S. attack on Fallujah, dubbed “Operation Phantom Fury,” Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein saw U.S. soldiers “open fire on the houses.” Hussein also reported seeing U.S. helicopters fire on and kill people, including a family of five, who tried to cross the river.

(Read the article)

News Media in the 60th Year of the Nuclear Age

by Norman Solomon

Top officials in Washington are now promoting jitters about Iran

Clinging to a segregationist past?

Alabamians vote to keep outdated language on separate schools for blacks and whites in their state Constitution.

By Gary Younge

During his inaugural address in 1963, the then Alabama governor, George Wallace, took to the steps of the State Capitol and made a promise. Standing on the spot where Jefferson Davis had declared an independent Southern Confederacy just over 100 years before, he pledged: “In the name of the greatest people that ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny and I say: Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”

Monday it looked as if he might get his wish, after a referendum in the state appeared likely to keep segregation-era wording requiring separate schools for “white and colored children” in its Constitution as well as references to the poll taxes once imposed to disenfranchise blacks. A narrow margin of 1,850 votes out of 1.38 million, or 0.13 percent, in a referendum on Nov. 2 meant the state was obliged to hold a recount, which started Monday. The recount may not be complete until next week, but with no accusations of electoral fraud or any other irregularities, nobody Monday night expected the result to change.

The ballot initiative sought to remove the most objectionable elements of the state’s Constitution that remain, even though they have been overridden by more recent civil rights legislation. They include passages such as: “Separate schools shall be provided for white and colored children, and no child of either race shall be permitted to attend a school of the other race.”

And: “To avoid confusion and disorder and to promote effective and economical planning for education, the legislature may authorize the parents or guardians of minors, who desire that such minors shall attend schools provided for their own race.”

Almost 50 years since Rosa Parks was ejected from a bus in the shadow of the governor’s mansion because she would not move to the back, most people thought the amendment to remove the segregation clause would pass fairly easily. “It was more ceremonial than legalistic,” said Bryan Fair, a law professor at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa. “The language in the Constitution was already unconstitutional and this would have brought Alabama up to date. So it was surprising that something so clear and symbolic would be even close.”

(Read the article)

Something’s Fishy in Ohio

by Jesse Jackson

In the Ukraine, citizens are in the streets protesting what they charge is a fixed election. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell expresses this nation’s concern about apparent voting irregularities. The media give the dispute around-the-clock coverage. But in the United States, massive and systemic voter irregularities go unreported and unnoticed.

Ohio is this election year’s Florida. The vote in Ohio decided the presidential race, but it was marred by intolerable, and often partisan, irregularities and discrepancies. U.S. citizens have as much reason as those in Kiev to be concerned that the fix was in. Consider:

In Ohio, a court just ruled there can’t be a recount yet, because the vote is not yet counted. It’s three weeks after the election, and Ohio still hasn’t counted the votes and certified the election. Some 93,000 overvotes and undervotes are not counted; 155,000 provisional ballots are only now being counted. Absentee ballots cast in the two days prior to the election haven’t been counted.

Ohio determines the election, but the state has not yet counted the vote. That outrage is made intolerable by the fact that the secretary of state in charge of this operation, Ken Blackwell, holds — like Katherine Harris of Florida’s fiasco in 2000 — a dual role: secretary of state with control over voting procedures and co-chair of George Bush’s Ohio campaign. Blackwell should recuse himself so that a thorough investigation, count and recount of Ohio’s vote can be made.

Blackwell reversed rules on provisional ballots in place in the spring primaries. These allowed voters to cast provisional ballots anywhere in their county, even if they were in the wrong precinct, reflecting the chief rationale for provisional ballots: to ensure that those who went to the wrong place by mistake could have their votes counted. The result of this decision — why does this not surprise? — was to disqualify disproportionately ballots cast in heavily Democratic Cuyahoga County.

(Read the article)

Goody, goody, gumdrop

Molly Ivins

AUSTIN, Texas — Goody, goody, gumdrop. We could get Phil Gramm back again, this time as secretary of the treasury. Oh how I’ve missed that little ray of sunshine, the bleeding heart from Bryan, the man who thinks poor people are all fat. As author Jim Hightower used to say, if you need a heart transplant, try to get Phil Gramm’s — it’s never been used.

Just what we need for treasury secretary: the banking industry’s errand boy. The man who helped bring us Enron.

According to The Washington Post, President Bush wants a new economic team. Can’t imagine why. Oh, here it is. It’s “part of Bush’s preparation for sending Congress an ambitious second-term domestic agenda.” He wants someone “who can better relate to Congress and be more effective in dealing with financial markets and television interviewers.”

There you have it — Phil’s perfect for the job. Mr. Charm. And he knows how to talk those seniors into getting rid of Social Security. He’s in practice. He’s been back here in Texas lobbying to make it legal to sell “dead peasant” life insurance to the Teacher Retirement System.

“Dead peasant” insurance is such a deal that Wal-Mart and lots of big companies do it. See, a company like Wal-Mart takes out life insurance on low-wage employees (that would be Texas teachers), then it gets to deduct the premiums from its taxes. And when the employee dies, the company gets a benefit between $64,000 to more than $250,000.

(Read the article)

Stinky and the Vulcans

By Sheila Samples

The kid and I were chatting happily last week about really really important things such as this country’s top movie, Spongebob Squarepants, when, suddenly, she pointed at the TV screen behind me. Then, as her face contorted in anger, she said ominously, “He’s e-e-e-e-v-u-l…”

Startled by the look on her face, I turned to the TV, expecting to see the Red Skull with his boot on the neck of Captain America – but it was only George Bush, smirking and chortling and kissing members of his cabinet on the lips. “No, honey,” I said, “that’s only the president. That’s George Bush.”

“Well, okay,” she said, with a shudder. Then, squenching her eyes shut and pursing her lips, she muttered – “But I’m gonna call him Stinky.”

I don’t know which is more appalling – that millions of comatose adults flock to theaters to pay homage to Spongebob Squarepants while the world goes to hell around them, or that a single 8-year-old, familiar with the stark, good-versus-evil battles waged by Spiderman, Captain Marvel and the entire battalion of Ninja Rangers could take one look at George Bush and instantly recognize a villian.

I hope she never sees Paul Wolfowitz, Condi Rice, Richard Perle and the rest of the Vulcans when they take their second-term circus act on the road. Wow. What a gig. Think about it. Stinky and the Vulcans – The Greatest Show on Earth. Coming soon to a midway near you.

(Read the article)

Embassy sounds alarm over growing dangers in Iraq

By Patrick Cockburn in Baghdad

Disintegrating security in Baghdad was underlined in a sombre warning yesterday from the British embassy against using the airport road or taking a plane out of Iraq.

The embassy says a bomb was discovered on a flight inside Iraq on 22 November. It shows that insurgents have been able to penetrate the stringent security at Baghdad airport. The embassy says its own staff have been advised against taking commercial planes.

The warning is in sharp contrast to more optimistic statements from US military commanders after the capture of Fallujah in which they have spoken of “breaking the back of the insurgency”.

The embassy says that the road between Baghdad and the international airport, perhaps the most important highway in the country, is now too dangerous to use. The advice says starkly: “With effect from 28 November, the British embassy ceased all movements on the Baghdad International airport road.”

The airport road is littered with evidence of previous attacks: the twisted cars used by suicide bombers and craters from roadside bombs.

There are no safe havens. Since March, 14 British civilians have been killed. Not only have insurgents proved capable of putting a bomb on a plane, but on 14 October two suicide bombers entered the heavily fortified Green Zone and blew themselves up, killing five people and injuring many more.

Danger levels in the capital are also increasing; some of the resistance fighters who were previously in Fallujah have taken refuge in Baghdad. They may wish to launch spectacular attacks to offset the fall of Fallujah, which had been the de facto capital of the insurgents.

(Read the article)

‘They hate our policies, not our freedom’

Quietly released Pentagon report contains major criticisms of administration.

by Tom Regan, Jim Bencivenga, Matthew Clark — | csmonitor.com

Late on the Wednesday afternoon before the Thanksgiving holiday, the US Defense Department released a report by the Defense Science Board that is highly critical of the administration’s efforts in the war on terror and in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

‘Muslims do not hate our freedom, but rather they hate
our policies [the report says]. The overwhelming majority voice their
objections to what they see as one-sided support in favor of Israel and
against Palestinian rights, and the long-standing, even increasing,
support for what Muslims collectively see as tyrannies, most notably
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan and the Gulf states. Thus, when
American public diplomacy talks about bringing democracy to Islamic
societies, this is seen as no more than self-serving hypocrisy.’

The Pentagon released the study after The New York Times ran a story about the report in its Wednesday editions.

(Read the article)

Jesse Jackson: Kerry’s “Early Concession Betrayed the Trust of the Voters”

As voter fraud in Ukraine’s election dominates the headlines, we take a look at the U.S. election and the widespread reports of voter irregularities in Ohio. We speak with the Rev. Jesse Jackson who is calling for an Ohio recount and an attorney filing a lawsuit in the Ohio Supreme Court this week to contest the election. [includes rush transcript]


We turn now to election news: Democracy Now co-host Juan Gonzalez writes in today’s New York Daily News:

“Voter fraud in the Ukraine? Give me a break.

“It has been a month now and we still don’t have a clear count of the votes for our own presidential race from the state of Ohio.

“For those who may have forgotten, Ohio supposedly assured George W. Bush a second term in the White House – only the most important job on the planet.

“The morning after the election, we were told Bush was ahead of John Kerry in that state’s unofficial count by 139,000 votes, or 2.5%.

“At the time there were 155,000 uncounted provisional ballots and an unknown number of overseas ballots, but Kerry concluded they would not produce enough of a margin to erase his deficit, so he promptly conceded.

“At the same time, given the bitter Democratic memories of the 2000 Florida fiasco, he assured his supporters he would fight to have every vote properly counted this time.

“Within a few days, other problems began to show up in Ohio’s preliminary tally.”

(Read the article)

Where There’s Smoke, There’s Fire

Electronic Voting and the Legitimacy of the 2004 Presidential election

By Bruce W. Fraser

I’m not one for fantastical explanations or conspiracy theories, so when murmurings about election fraud in the recent presidential election began to make their way into the public dialogue, I didn’t
think much of it. However, when a research team at UC Berkeley released the results of its statistical analysis of voting patterns in Florida recently, [1] my skepticism gave way to a healthy curiosity about the factual evidence behind the study.

As it turns out, there are a number of reasons to be skeptical about the official results of the recent presidential election, reasons that transcend party politics and raise questions about the integrity of the democratic process in this country. My purpose here is to provide some general observations that link the Berkeley study with other, equally important information about the accuracy of the recent election results.

The press release that introduced the Berkeley study to the public is unequivocal in its implications: “UC Berkeley Research Team Sounds Smoke Alarm’ for Florida E-Vote Count; Irregularities may have awarded 130,000 – 260,000 or more excess votes to Bush in Florida.”

(Read the article)

Seeing Is Beliving!


A Flying Lawn Mower

American Taliban Strikes Again


“ I believe when we defy the Lord, I think we pay a price for it.”

Let Us See Your Lips Move

Repeat After Us: Social Security Is Not In Crisis
Social Security Is Not In Crisis

Dean Baker

After the inauguration, Bush is scheduled to push for tort reform first, then attack Social Security. His entitlements offensive relies on the White House’s ability to make Americans think Social Security is in crisis. Dean Baker says it’s not. But don’t just take his word for it. The Social Security Trustees say the same thing.

Dean Baker is economist and co-director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) in Washington, DC.

In the wake of his election victory , President Bush said that cutting Social Security will be at the top of his second-term agenda. He supports a proposal from his Social Security commission that hits workers with large cuts in their Social Security benefits. The proposed cuts are phased in over time, but an average wage earner who is 20 today will see their total Social Security benefits cut by close to $160,000 over their retirement. They will have the option of trying to retrieve a small portion of these cuts by seeking higher returns in the stock market, with the additional risk this implies.

Virtually everyone agrees that Social Security is a great system. It provides tens of millions of workers with a guaranteed, core retirement income. It also provides disability insurance to people during their working years. In addition, it provides survivors’ insurance to the children of workers who die at an early age.

It is also extremely efficient. The administrative costs of Social Security are just 0.6 cents of every dollar that gets paid out in benefits. By contrast, the administrative costs of systems of private accounts, like the one in England, eat up 15 cents of every dollar in benefits. Social Security also has a minimal amount of fraud and abuse, as numerous government audits have repeatedly documented.

(Read the article)

Voting Machines Count Backwards in Okla.

by Bob Nichols Saturday, Nov 27 2004, 3:13am bobnichols@cox.net

57 Rural Counties Affected – Vote Fraud Suspected

Rural Oklahoma Voting machines know how to count backwards.

(Oklahoma City) November 18, 2004 – Rural Oklahoma Voting machines know how to count backwards.

That looks like what the secretly programmed machines did for Sen. Kerry in President Bush’s easily won Presidential Election victory in Oklahoma.

All 77 counties use the Optech Eagle voting machines and Tabulator’s made by ES&S, Sen Hagel’s republican company.

The respectable, conservative “Tulsa World” newspaper reported Nov 3rd that Kerry was winning in 57 of the states’s rural counties., with 70% of the vote counted. Turns out that the famous November 3rd report was probably not supposed to be printed.

It represented the counting when the tabulating was about 70% “complete,” as they used to say in the old Soviet Unon.

The “official” State of Oklahoma Election Board vote totals released later show Kerry not winning; but, losing in all the state’s 77 counties, including the 57 rural counties. Yea, somebody really messed up, big time, and published a partially completed and, I guess you would have to call it, “fixed” vote.

A simple comparison of total votes for Kerry between the staid establishment mouthpiece, the “Tulsa World” newspaper and the so-called “official” final vote totals at the State Election Board show fewer votes for Kerry in 57 counties than the “Tulsa World” does.

(Read the article)

Voter Suppression Challenged by Ohioans, Allies

by Ariella Cohen (bio)

After two days of public hearings in Columbus, voters’ rights activists are compiling information for legal action against election officials and working for electoral reform.

According to legal observers, problems resulting from inadequately prepared county employees at inner-city polls ranged from unfairly towed and ticketed cars to illegally discouraged voters.

Two separate voter advocacy coalitions are putting together federal lawsuits against election officials in Franklin County, Ohio, alleging unfair allocation of polling materials, staff and equipment that disenfranchised thousands of voters in the county’s low-income and African-American precincts.

Drawing from testimonies gathered at public hearings concluding Monday at the Columbus courthouse, a coalition of voter advocacy groups including People for the American Way, Common Cause Ohio, Citizens Alliance for a Fair Election (CASE Ohio) and The League of Pissed-Off Voters contend that state election practices suppressed voters in lower-income precincts and violated constitutional law guaranteeing all US citizens the right to vote.

Common Cause Ohio, a democracy advocacy organization, rests its federal complaint against the Franklin County Board of Elections on the 14th amendment guarantee to equal protection and the 1965 Voting Rights Act declaring federal protection against racially discriminatory electoral practices. Grounding their suit in the public testimonies as well as county records of Election Day procedures, Common Cause intends to challenge this election and push forward more astringent electoral legislation.

Current Ohio code is fraught with advisories and guidelines, but many decisions remain up to the discretion of local officials. For instance, in 1992, when e-voting replaced paper ballots in Franklin county, guidelines advising that polling locations provide one voting machine per 100 registered precinct resident were issued. Yet, no laws regulate or enforce this advisory and witnesses at the public hearings said that at some polling places 160 to 200 voters used each machine.

(Read the article)

U.S. Group to File Iraq War Crimes Case in Germany

Reuters

Nov. 29, 2004 – Lawyers acting for a U.S. advocacy group will Tuesday file war crimes charges in Germany against senior U.S. administration officials for their alleged role in torture at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

“German law in this area is leading the world,” Peter Weiss, vice president of the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), a human rights group, was quoted as saying in Frankfurter Rundschau newspaper’s Tuesday edition.

According to the group, German law allows war criminals to be investigated wherever they may be living.

Those to be named in the case to be filed at Germany’s Federal Prosecutors Office include Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, former Central Intelligence Agency chief George Tenet and eight other officials.

The group is due to present details of its case at several news conferences Tuesday, according to invitations faxed to media organizations.

Recount Effort Is Expanded To New Mexico and Nevada

washingtonpost.com
Tuesday, November 30, 2004; Page A02

Green Party presidential candidate David Cobb and Libertarian candidate Michael Badnarik announced that they are seeking recounts in two more battleground states: New Mexico and Nevada.

The third-party candidates, who already have requested a recount in Ohio, won few votes in both states. But a Cobb spokesman said they were concerned that reports of Election Day problems at the states’ polls were being ignored.

President Bush won both states. Cobb spokesman Blair Bobier said a “527″ organization called the Help America Recount Fund, which is affiliated with the National Ballot Integrity Project, is paying for the recounts.

Meanwhile, Jesse L. Jackson was in Ohio over the weekend to lend his support to the Buckeye State’s impending recount.

– Brian Faler

Next Page »