Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to Comments

Fold/Spindle/Mutilate 2.1


An Online Dowser and Filter Of Important Information


Teen pleads guilty to attacking girlfriend for her Kerry support

By Missy Stoddard
Staff Writer

Steven Soper had his life all mapped out.

The 18-year-old from Lake Worth had been accepted into the Army and planned to enlist after graduating this spring from Santaluces High School.

But the plan came apart in late October when he attacked his girlfriend after learning she planned to vote for Sen. John Kerry in the presidential election.

Soper pleaded guilty Wednesday to false imprisonment, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, battery and resisting arrest without violence. Circuit Judge Jorge Labarga sentenced Soper to 90 days in jail followed by five years of probation and 100 hours of community service. The judge ordered Soper to write a letter of apology to 18-year-old Stacey Silveira, whom he dated for two years, according to Silveira. Soper is also required to complete a batterers’ intervention program, undergo psychological and substance abuse evaluations and complete any recommended treatment.

(Read the article)

THE MINUTEMAN PROJECT

Self-described as “the nation’s largest neighborhood watch group,” the Minuteman Project is a group of hundreds of volunteers, mostly recruited off the Internet, who will spend the next month patrolling the 23-mile San Pedro Valley border with the intent of reporting “sightings of illegal activity to Border Patrol agents.” There are fears from law enforcement and human rights groups alike that the group will “attract racist crackpots and lead to vigilante violence,” especially since “at least one white supremacist group has mentioned the project on its Web site,” calling to action “All Aryan Soldiers.” There will be volunteers armed with handguns, but organizers of the project claim that volunteers have been “instructed to avoid confrontation” and their goal is actually to raise public awareness of porous borders with Mexico. The chief of the U.S. Border Patrol’s Tucson sector stated, “The volunteers are ‘not the kind of help the Border Patrol is asking for.’”

Most Americans Say No Nations Should Have Nuclear Weapons

by Will Lester

WASHINGTON — Most Americans surveyed in a poll say they do not think any country, including the United States, should have nuclear weapons. That sentiment is at odds with current efforts by some nations that are trying to develop the weapons and by terrorists seeking to add them to their arsenal.

The only use of an atomic bomb – by the United States against Japan at the end of World War II – provokes sharply different reactions, depending on the age of those asked. Young adults tend to disapprove, while older Americans tend to approve, an AP-Ipsos poll found.

Albert Kauzmann, a 57-year-old resident of Norcross, Ga., said using the bomb in 1945 “was the best way they had of ending” World War II.

Six in 10 people age 65 and older approve of the use of the atomic bomb at the end of World War II; the same percentage of respondents 18 to 29 disapprove.

(Read the article)

A tale told by an idiot

Wildly overplaying the Schiavo protesters, ignoring facts and giving Bush a free ride, the press was full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

By Eric Boehlert

It was fitting that reporters were in danger of outnumbering pro-life supporters outside Terri Schiavo’s hospice in Pinellas Park, Fla., on Thursday morning. When one man began to play the trumpet moments after Schiavo’s death was announced at 9:50 a.m., a gaggle of cameramen quickly surrounded him, two or three deep.

Has there ever been a set of protesters so small, so out of proportion, so outnumbered by the press, for a story that had supposedly set off a “furious debate” nationwide? That’s how Newsweek.com described the Schiavo story this week. Although it’s not clear how a country can have a “furious debate” when two-thirds of its citizens agree on the issue or, in the case of some Schiavo poll questions (i.e., Were Congress and President Bush wrong to intervene?), four out of five Americans agree.

But the “furious debate” angle has been a crucial selling point in the Schiavo story in part because editors and producers could never justify the extraordinary amount of time and resources they set aside for the story if reporters made plain in covering it every day that the issue was being driven by a very small minority who were out of step with the mainstream.

Clearly, the press went overboard in its around-the-clock coverage of the right-to-die case. But at this point, that type of exploitation is almost to be expected from news organizations, particularly television, desperate for compelling narratives that can be stretched out for days or weeks at a time. And it’s not fair to suggest that the Schiavo story was a manufactured one, or that it didn’t spark genuine interest. It did.

(Read the article)

Debt Slavery: What The Bankruptcy Bill Could Do To You

by David Swanson

The U.S. Senate has passed a dream bill
for credit card and financial service companies that, if passed by
the House, will land millions of American families in debt slavery. Rather
than being able to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and make a difficult
new start, families and individuals will be placed on long-term payment
plans to credit card companies, companies that will take their houses,
their cars, their child-support payments, and their paychecks.

If you think you’re unlikely to land yourself
a share-cropping position in this new feudal system, ask yourself
if you can be sure that no one in your family will get sick, be injured,
die, lose a job, or get divorced. More than one in every 100 adults
in America files for bankruptcy each year. If you’re a child, the
chances of your family filing for bankruptcy are about twice that. (Kids
cost money.) These rates have doubled in the past decade. The basic
reason that bankruptcies have increased is that personal debt has
increased. In fact, in proportion to debt, bankruptcies are actually
down.

About 50 percent of all families who are
forced to file for bankruptcy do so as the result of medical expenses. And
three quarters of those have health insurance. Another 40 percent
have suffered a death in the family, lost their job, or gotten divorced,
or suffered some combination of these factors and medical costs. Almost
everyone who files for bankruptcy does so as a last resort. Sixty-one
percent of those who do so have gone without medical care that they
needed but could not afford. Fifty percent have failed to get prescriptions
filled. A third have had their utilities shut off. Twenty-one percent
have gone without food. Seven percent have moved their elderly parents
to cheaper care facilities.

The satirical magazine, The Onion, posted
fictional comments on the bankruptcy bill from people in the street,
one of which said “Well, there goes my foolproof get-bankrupt-quick
scheme!” Only in the mind of a comic or a Republican
do people try to go bankrupt. But some Democrats (see below) seem
not to be grasping this concept either.


(Read the article)

A Quarterly Report from Bush-Cheney Media Enterprises

by Norman Solomon

The first quarter of 2005 brought significant media dividends for the Bush-Cheney limited liability corporation.

Stakeholders received windfalls as mainstream news outlets deferred to consolidation of power from the November election.

A rollout of new “democracy” branding — kicked off by the State of the Union product relaunch — yielded at least temporary gains in psychological market share. For instance, repackaging of images in the Middle East implemented makeovers for several client governments. Actual democratic threats, inimical to Bush-Cheney LLC interests, remain low.

Our major domestic financial goal, the privatization of Social Security, is out of reach for the next several quarters. However, in view of the magnitude of potential profits, this massive effort will continue.

(Read the article)

I Spy a Screw-Up

By MAUREEN DOWD

WASHINGTON

Like the new Woody Allen movie, “Melinda and Melinda,” it is possible to view today’s big story on the tremendous intelligence failures before the Iraq war as either comedy or tragedy, depending on how you look at it.

For instance, on the comic side, The Times reported yesterday that administration officials were relieved that the new report by a presidential commission had “found no evidence that political pressure from the White House or Pentagon contributed to the mistaken intelligence.”

That’s hilarious.

As necessity is the mother of invention, political pressure was the father of conveniently botched intelligence.

Dick Cheney and the neocons at the Pentagon started with the conclusion they wanted, then massaged and manipulated the intelligence to back up their wishful thinking.

As The New Republic reported, Mr. Cheney lurked at the C.I.A. in the summer of 2002, an intimidating presence for young analysts. And Douglas Feith set up the Office of Special Plans at the Pentagon as a shadow intelligence agency to manufacture propaganda bolstering the administration’s case.


(Read the article)

Seymour Hersh: Bush is “Unreachable”

by Gloria R. Lalumia, BuzzFlash Columnist

Seymour Hersh visited New Mexico State University (Las Cruces) on
Tuesday, March 29 as part of his speaking tour for his newest book,

George W. Bush, the Frightened Man

By WilliamPitt,

You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you.

-Eric Hoffer

When I went to New York City this past summer to cover the GOP
convention, I remember being awed by the degree of security surrounding
Madison Square Garden. There were fences to control the fences, fifty
cops on every corner, none of whom knew what the others were telling
people to do, a half-dozen passes of needed to get twenty feet in any
direction, and that was before you even got inside the door

I saw the same thing when I went to DC to cover the Inauguration. The
capitol was an armed camp, a sea of Bush supporters surrounded by tens
of thousands of protesters. At one point, I stopped for 30 seconds next
to a squad car to check my cell phone, and was immediately confronted
by three cops asking me what I was doing. Amusingly, the security
fences and cops decided not to give those protesters One Big Spot to
congregate, and instead spread them out like butter across the entire
route. The effect was to make the protests seem much larger than they
were – and they were big – while forcing the Bush folk to elbow past
them every six feet for the entire length of Pennsylvania Avenue.

All those fences. All those guns. All those cops. At first, it seemed
like an arguably necessary precaution; these were, after all, the two
cities to take the hit on 9/11. But the longer I stayed, the longer I
looked around, and the closer I observed the behavior of Bush and his
people, I came to a sad conclusion: This security was not about keeping
us all safe from terrorists, but was about keeping Bush safe from his
own people. The President of the United States is flatly terrified of
the citizens he would supposedly lead to some supply-side promised
land. He is scared to death of us.

(Read the article)

Energy insanity

Just when you thought it was impossible, Cheney energy schemes get even worse

Molly Ivins – Creators Syndicate

AUSTIN, Texas — As a general rule about Bush & Co., the more closely
a policy is associated with Dick Cheney, the worse it is. Which brings
us to energy policy — remember his secret task force? In the long
history of monumentally bad ideas, the Cheney policy is a standout for
reasons of both omission and commission. Dumb, dumber and dumbest.

Ponder this: Next year, the administration will phase out the $2,000
tax credit for buying a hybrid vehicle, which gets over 50 miles per
gallon, but will leave in place the $25,000 tax write-off for a Hummer,
which gets 10-12 mpg. That’s truly crazy, and that’s truly what the whole
Cheney energy policy is.

According to the Energy Information Administration in the Department
of Energy, last year’s energy bill (same as this one) would cost
taxpayers at least $31 billion, do nothing about the projected over-80 percent
increase in America’s imports of foreign oil by 2025, and increase
gasoline prices. (Since every bureaucrat who tells the truth in this
administration — about the cost of the drug bill or the safety of Vioxx —
seems to get the ax, I’m probably getting those folks in trouble.)

(Read the article)

Who are Karen Brauer and “Pharmacists for Life”?

On the March 29 edition of CNN’s American Morning, anchor Carol Costello interviewed a “pharmacist fired for refusing to fill a prescription for birth control pills.” But while Costello’s co-anchor, Bill Hemmer, teased the segment as a report on the tension between “pharmacist beliefs” and “women’s rights,” Pharmacists for Life president Karen Brauer appeared by herself to discuss the topic, with no one presenting an opposing view. Further, Costello failed to point out the serious questions about Pharmacists for Life’s credibility, ask Brauer about her own credibility problems, or ask Brauer obvious questions about the appropriateness of pharmacists refusing to fill prescriptions. CNN’s treatment of Brauer, though, is consistent with several other news reports that have mentioned her or her organization without explaining their background or giving readers and viewers a full picture of them.

The Issue:

Brauer and Pharmacists for Life are at the forefront of a growing movement aimed at giving pharmacists the right to refuse to fill prescriptions if filling them would be inconsistent with their moral or ethical beliefs. Thus far, the fight has primarily revolved around birth control prescriptions.

On February 10, the Associated Press reported:

Last year, Mississippi lawmakers passed a bill that allows all types of health care workers and facilities to refuse performing virtually any service they object to on moral or religious grounds. Anti-abortion organizations and a group called Pharmacists for Life are urging pharmacists to refuse to distribute emergency contraceptives.

(Read the article)

Goldberg Flies Air America

Music-biz biggie pilots a new radio hit

by NIKKI FINKE


Ride, captain, ride, upon
your mystery ship!

Maybe it

18 Senators and a $2 Million Flip-Flop

Several days ago, we linked to a post on the Center for American Progress blog that raised an important question for the 18 senators that voted for a 1991 amendment offered by former Senator Alfonse D’Amato (R-NY) to limit the interest rate credit companies can charge to 14 percent only to vote against an amendment offered by Senator Mark Dayton (D-MN) to the current bankruptcy bill that would have limited that rate to 30 percent. Thinkprogress asked: Why would 18 Senators, including co-sponsors of the original measure, vote for a tougher pro-consumer measure in 1991, and then vote against a weaker measure in 2005? Could it be that the more than $2 million these Senators took from the credit card/banking industry in the interim made them change their mind?

We offer the following list of those senators in case our readers wish to get an answer for themselves:

(Read the article)

The Dumbocrats

Does anyone in the Democratic party have any brain cells to speak of? Stuff like this makes you wonder.

Kos
details yet another example of peaceful dissenters being excluded from
one of President Bush

Latin America Alarmed Over U.S. Plan to ‘Hunt’ Illegal Immigrants

Citizens in Arizona plan to send out patrols to apprehend undocumented immigrants, and the idea has people in South and Central America worried about the kind of justice the group might mete out to those it finds.

EDITORIAL

No one with even the most elementary grasp of logic can fail to see the significance
of having human volunteers hunting undocumented immigrants in the deserts and
border areas of the United States and Mexico, with the object of turning them
over to the authorities.

Although the United States government in its official declarations,
even at the presidential level, has condemned this type of action – as it should
– there has been no official reaction to the announcement that about 1,000 citizens
of Tombstone, Arizona, will hold a public meeting next Friday to muster volunteers
for the plan. [The plan is called the Minute Man Project: www.minutemanproject.com

The announcement, in and of itself, is not a crime. But it
will be impossible to avoid the fact that a great many violations of human rights
will take place, and many of those will be violations carried out with impunity.

(Read the article)

Wolfowitz Shunned by Most of E.U.

Most of the EU cast miss Wolfowitz

Terry Schiavo Could Save Millions of Young Women’s Lives

by Thom Hartmann

Years ago, a popular and wry sign to hang in one’s office or on one’s cubicle said, “A Clean Desk Is The Sign Of A Sick Mind.” There is a very faint grain of truth to that, which highlights an opportunity for the media to use Terry Schaivo’s tragic situation to actually save lives of girls and women (and a few men) in non-vegetative states.

For years it was believed that anorexia (not eating) and bulimia (eating and vomiting or “purging”) were signs of an exogenous “induced” (life-experience-caused) mental illness. The most common theories constituted a hodge-podge of ideas ranging from “bad parenting” and child abuse to the more Freudian “poor toilet training,” and psychotherapy to treat anorexia and/or bulimia centered around trying to remember, bring out, relive, and/or relieve these “causes.” These therapies rarely worked, and often made situations worse by focusing on the loci of the obsession.

Then along came the SSRI drugs – selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors – antidepressants like Prozac. In the course of researching these drugs, it was accidentally discovered that they were often successful in treating people with obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD), and that people with anorexia and, particularly, bulimia responded well to them. (The downside of the SSRI’s is that they cause lack of affect and increase the chances of suicide, as recent studies and the stories of so many school shooters on SSRI drugs show.)

(Read the article)

The State of the World? It is on the Brink of Disaster

An Authoritative Study of the Biological Relationships Vital to Maintaining Life has Found Disturbing Evidence of Man-made Degradation

by Steve Connor

Planet Earth stands on the cusp of disaster and people should no longer take it for granted that their children and grandchildren will survive in the environmentally degraded world of the 21st century. This is not the doom-laden talk of green activists but the considered opinion of 1,300 leading scientists from 95 countries who will today publish a detailed assessment of the state of the world at the start of the new millennium.

The report does not make jolly reading. The academics found that two-thirds of the delicately-balanced ecosystems they studied have suffered badly at the hands of man over the past 50 years.

The dryland regions of the world, which account for 41 per cent of the earth’s land surface, have been particularly badly damaged and yet this is where the human population has grown most rapidly during the 1990s.

Slow degradation is one thing but sudden and irreversible decline is another. The report identifies half a dozen potential “tipping points” that could abruptly change things for the worse, with little hope of recovery on a human timescale.

(Read the article)

How could you possibly be so stupid?

Neurologist Cranford confronted Scarborough, MSNBC daytime anchor: “[Y]ou’re asking me if a CAT scan was done? How could you possibly be so stupid?”

On the March 28 edition of MSNBC’s Scarborough Country, host Joe Scarborough interviewed Dr. Ronald Cranford, one of the two neurologists selected by Michael Schiavo to examine Terri Schiavo pursuant to an October 2001 appellate court mandate. As part of that duty, Cranford “reviewed her medical records and personally conducted a neurological examination of Mrs. Schiavo,” according to the June 2003 Florida appeals court review of that hearing.

Following is the transcript of the interview:

SCARBOROUGH: Now, the question on everybody’s mind tonight is this: How is Terri Schiavo doing? You know, it’s been 10 days. She is starting her 11th day now without food and water. Let’s go back to Pinellas Park [Florida], where Lisa Daniels [MSNBC daytime anchor] is standing by — Lisa.

DANIELS: Well, Joe, at this point, we are going to delve into the medical aspect of the story. I want to bring in Dr. Ronald Cranford. He’s a neurologist at Hennepin Medical Center in Minneapolis. And, Doctor, before we continue, I want our viewers to understand what your role was in the legal case. I understand that Michael Schiavo and his team asked you to examine his wife. Is that correct?

(Read the article)

Next Page »